Search for: "THE PRESSURE POSITIVE CO., INC. v. SIMPLE INTERNATIONAL, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2007, 2:00 pm
Since the date of that decision, however, the Supreme Court decided KSR International Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Google and the related case, Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In or around 2008, Alice Kimble added David Kimble as a co-owner on the UBS account. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Tribune Co, the court noted there is a “strong presumption against finding binding obligations in agreements which include open terms, call for future approvals, and expressly anticipate future preparation and execution of contract documents. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), failed to answer this question. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Moreover, as I suggested in prior year self assessments, however this course is conceived, it will have to convince students of its relevance at a time when course allocation time is scarce and market pressures for employment militate against "fluff", at least as students (and potential employers) see it. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
” The Supreme Court set forth three simple Revlon triggers: “(1) when a corporation initiates an active bidding process seeking to sell itself or to effect a business reorganization involving a clear break-up of the company; (2) where, in response to a bidder’s offer, a target abandons its long-term strategy and seeks an alternative transaction involving the break-up of the company; or (3) when approval of a transaction results in a sale or change of control. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
AMG Capital Management, INC. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Washington (2004).Together, these scholars have persuasively shown that lower federal courts are simultaneously under much more constant capacity pressure than the Supreme Court and much more limited in the tools available to them to manage this pressure. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Questionnaires should require information on whether the nominee is an employee, officer, partner or co-investor of the nominating stockholder. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
Miles, III, spells out exactly how the Stored Communications Act could apply to employers requesting Facebook passwords: In Pietrylo v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
” Id. at 410 (internal quotations omitted); see also id. at 409-11 & n. 44. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
As discussed here, last year, the Seventh Circuit, in a blistering opinion written by Judge Richard Posner in a merger objection lawsuit involving Walgreen’s acquisition of Alliance Boots, affirmatively adopted the Delaware Chancery Court’s position on disclosure-only settlements. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
Why, hat’s a darn fine question with which few in positions of power seem to be concerned. [read post]
